UNFPA, which operates programs in 150 countries, is still in an very early stages of assessing which initiatives it will have to axe. But the organization liberated a number of devastating figures to demonstrate where the cuts will be felt most.
Trump slashing UNFPAs budget would result in about 48,000 pregnant women in Syria losing access to safe deliveries, the group said in a release.
The organization supports pregnant women in the two countries in a variety of ways, including by providing delivery kits containing a plastic sheet, a razor blade, a saloon of soap, a rope and string. This is the most rudimentary way to ensure a safe delivery, Craven said.
UNFPA operates the only maternal health clinic at the Zaatari refugee camp in Jordan, and Craven said the funding cuts will hurt Syrian women who are lucky enough to make it there.About 7,100 babies have been born at the ward without a single maternal death.
The cuts will also likely lead to about 50,000 people in Yemen losing access to reproductive health services. Nearly 120 midwives stand to lose their home-based clinics, which could also lead to more girls succumbing in childbirth. Home births play a critical role in remote conflict zones where women cant access hospitals.
This is, yet again, another attack on sexual and reproductive health and those key services that are really essential, mentioned Jonathan Rucks, advocacy administrator of Population Action International, a group that works with UNFPA to champion womens reproductive rights. Another attack on womens health without any regard for the implications for this decision.
They literally sat at a desk and Googled, and did a desk review and made a determination. Jonathan Rucks, advocacy administrator of PAI
Rucks said he found it especially frustrating that the U.S. State Department didnt even visit China before deciding to cut funding to UNFPA.
Theyve made this decision without doing any research in country, Rucks mentioned. They literally sat at a desk and Googled, and did a desk review and made a determination. They are now moving to defund, which is going to have an incredible impact on humanitarian situates around the world.
The State Department said in a statement to The Huffington Post that there is no evidence that UNFPA immediately engages in coercive abortions and involuntary disappearances sterilizations in China. But the U.N. group collaborators with the Chinese government agency responsible for implementing the countrys two-child policy, which the State Department said it considered enough of a reason to defund the group.
But UNFPAs connection doesnt signify much, Craven said.
The National Health and Family Planning Commission in China is the equivalent of a Ministry of Health, she mentioned, adding that its standard for any human rights organisation is working in China to work with it.
If you look at the working groups working in China, thats the entity everyone has to engage with, Craven mentioned. Its no different than what we do in every country where we work.
The UNFPAs programs in China focus on advancing reproductive rights, so individuals can choose when and how many children to have.
In the past, the State Department procured no mistake in UNFPAs the programmes in China. Department members lauded the UNFPAs efforts in China in 2015, after visiting the two countries with the U.S. Agency for International Development.
During its recent visit, the U.S. delegation find the positive impact of UNFPAs rights-based programming in China, the organizations said in a statement at the time. We commend[ UNFPAs] adherence to demonstrating the advantages of a voluntary approach to family planning and were pleased to see … increased provider emphasis on patient rights, especially with regard to privacy and confidentiality.
Former President George W. Bush also defunded UNFPA between 2002 and 2008. That decision was disillusioning at the time, but the world wasnt facing the number of humanitarian crises that it is now.Also, the Bush administration conducted a two-week visit to China before attaining that decision and also didnt find any evidence had demonstrated that UNFPA knowingly supported or been represented coercive abortion and involuntary disappearances sterilization.
At the end of the day, they both did the same thing, Rucks mentioned of Bush and Trump. At least[ the Bush] administration sent somebody to China. At least they went.
Such articles has been updated with commentary from the State Department and with more information about how UNFPA works with the Chinese government .
How will Trumps first 100 days impact you? Sign up for our weekly newsletter and get breaking updates on Trumps presidency by messaging us here .
Read more here: http :// www.huffingtonpost.com /~ ATAGEND