A massive new study shows how to reduce abortions and it’s not more regulation.


Abortion rates in the United States just reached a record low, dropping below a million per year for the first time since Roe v. Wade.

That information comes from a new learn by the Guttmacher Institute, a research and policy organisation is fully committed to sexual and reproductive health. It’s fair to say a hallmark reduced by any medical procedure is generally a good thing .

While the majority of Americans do support a womans right to choose, the topic of abortion remains contentious which induces it even more monumental that both pro-choice and anti-abortion groups alike are celebrating this news.

There are a lot of other important revelations in the Guttmachers massive data-crunch too. Even if youre not especially impassioned about the abortion debate, the study demonstrates the importance of looking at the bigger picture.

According to the researchers, “No strong indication exists that restrictions[ against abortion] were the main factor behind the decline in abortion.”

The study found that some states, particularly in the Northeast, were actually more successful at reducing the abortion rate by opening additional clinics and making abortions easier to get overall. But there were some situations, like in Texas, where forcing wives to tolerate humiliating and convoluted processes and procedures did appear to translate to a sharp decline in the abortion rate. Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers( TRAP) statutes weren’t as successful in other governments, such as North Carolina and Mississippi, and even led to slight increases in abortions, according to Guttmacher.

That’s why big analyses like these are so important: Instead of outlining the agreed conclusions from a few highly specific circumstances, they allow us to zoom out and learn the bigger scene, with all the different factors involved across state lines. In this case, it became clear theres just no way is to determine whether abortion limiteds actually accomplish anything other than constructing peoples lives most difficult.

Restricting abortion access also has the potential to set more lives at risk when women seek alternatives, and thats definitely not a good thing.

Abortion access is notably hardest to come by in southern and Midwestern states they tend to have more legal hoops for women to jump through as well as restrictions on facilities. While the official data is scarce, reports from Reuters, The Atlantic, and The New York Times suggest that limitations like these contributed to an increase in do-it-yourself abortions. And according to the Guttmacher study, medical facilities in southern and Midwestern states were also more likely on average to treat people who had already tried to self-induce an abortion.

Less than a decade before Roe v. Wade, illegal abortion procedures reportedly accounted for 17% of maternal fatalities, though the amount of unreported cases could have induced that number even higher. As of 2013, just 1 in 5 pregnancies end in abortion but the vast majority of those women remain alive to tell about it, thanks to medical promotions and safer, legalized procedures.

Abortions are down. But birth rates aren’t up. And there are also fewer wives dealing with unintended pregnancies. Maybe that’s the trick.

As Rachel Jones, the produce writer of the study, told NPR, “We belief the narrative that’s going on in a lot of situations, in a lot of states, is that fewer wives are having unintended pregnancies and in turn fewer abortions, and that is actually a good story.”

The study specifically cites the state of Iowa, which had one of the sharpest refuses in abortions in the two countries. While several abortion clinics in the state were shuttered in recent years, they also expanded access to long-acting reversible contraceptives and family planning, with targeted outreach to people in poor and low-income communities, who are much more likely to have unintended maternity or an abortion, especially when they already have infants. Not only does it relieve them of that potential load, it also saves fund for everyone in the long run.

Iowa’s not alone, either. According to the Guttmacher study, the use of IUDs and similar contraceptives is up more than 36% among all women since 2009, and 48% among women at government-supported programs or clinics . Meanwhile, teen pregnancy rates across the country have dropped by 25% in recent years too and credit is given to contraception accessibility , not abstinence-only education.

Womens health care is an intersectional problem, an economic problem, and above all, something wives should have more power over.

There’s lots of nuance in the Guttmacher study and the topic of abortion in general. And while there’s still more research needed, it’s hard to deny that more option and more control for women is a better thing for everyone .

I dont have a uterus. I dont know what its like. Ive never been and will never be pregnant. But I trust that wives can make better options about their own bodies, especially when theyre empowered and informed.

If you want to see fewer abortions, then you need to support the organizations either already furnish and fighting for reproductive health care. Thats the only behavior to guarantee peoples right to life.

Read more here: http :// www.upworthy.com /~ ATAGEND